Why did I love this book?
This fascinating book gives a different perspective on the scientific revolution, and an explanation for why that great leap forward took place between 1600 and 1700, rather than, say, a couple of thousand years ago.
The “iron rule of explanation”, that only empirical evidence counts, and of its consequence in “Baconian convergence” explains so much. Moreover, the exploration of how, and why, the social, cultural, and religious context enabled researchers of the time to separate their personal explorations and investigations from those they set forth in the wider scientific community is equally absorbing.
It gave an explanation for a real puzzle in the history of the development of science and civilisation, and brought alive the characters involved.
3 authors picked The Knowledge Machine as one of their favorite books, and they share why you should read it.
* Why is science so powerful?
* Why did it take so long-two thousand years after the invention of philosophy and mathematics-for the human race to start using science to learn the secrets of the universe?
In a groundbreaking work that blends science, philosophy, and history, leading philosopher of science Michael Strevens answers these challenging questions, showing how science came about only once thinkers stumbled upon the astonishing idea that scientific breakthroughs could be accomplished by breaking the rules of logical argument.
Like such classic works as Karl Popper's The Logic of Scientific Discovery and Thomas Kuhn's The Structure of…