The Dawn of Everything

Definitely a new and radical analysis of political history. The authors challenge the linear theory of political development. First, there were hunter-gatherers then herdsmen and farmers and humanity never backpedaled.

Historians/Anthropologists are beginning to question the Hobbesian assumption that life among the earliest hunter/gatherer societies was: "nasty, brutal and short". Rather, these early groups led a life of leisure compared to that of their successors, the farmers.

In one respect, history is the story of groups of small elites--made up of kings, warriors and priests---exploiting everyone else. Quoting Rousseau: "man is born free but is everywhere in chains," they ask… show more.

I enjoyed the authors’ marshaling of a wide range of new archaeological and anthropological research to upend much of the conventional narratives about the beginnings of human civilization. Early human societies centered on agriculture and experimented with diverse self-organizing principles.

Agriculture and animal domestication did not lead ineluctably, as old narratives insisted, to the protection of personal property in hierarchical cities and states with clear leaders. Although it is not a point of particular emphasis, the book clarifies that human societies thrived once Earth’s climate stabilized after deglaciation from the last Ice Age, while various human societies have since collapsed… show more.

I love this book because it changed the way I see the world and the supposed inevitability of our societies as we know them. In general, I love a good academic takedown when one academic writes a book to prove another wrong. But this book disproves the stories we’re told and tell each other about social evolution, the stories that say our inequality and horrible treatment of each other are unavoidable.

Dawn of Everything gave me hope and a profound realization that we get to decide what our cultures and human organization look like; the only thing holding us back… show more.

This is a “big history” book that covers many layers of human relationships with the natural world. The primary focus is what we typically refer to as prehistory and the origins of culture, agriculture, settlement, and the state.

What makes this book so compelling is that the authors counter so many traditional, post-colonial interpretations of these questions. They revitalize our respect for traditional knowledge and the wisdom of pre-industrial cultures while reinforcing our sense of wonder at the multitude of cultural forms and possibilities. 

This is especially important as they consider questions of participation, equity, and social justice in it's… show more.

A psychologist I happened to meet on a food tour in Atlanta recommended this to me when she learned I was a historian.

I admit to being dubious because I generally don’t have much time for sweeping histories of humanity, but this is of an entirely different order. It starts with a compelling question: when and how did we – humanity – get ‘stuck’ in a set of relations defined by extremes of social, economic, and political inequality and incapable of imagining any alternative?

It then spends most of the book demonstrating that it wasn’t ever thus, engaging in extraordinarily… show more.

The Dawn of Everything is a fairly dense academic tome, but it was eye-opening and very important, and I thoroughly enjoyed reading it.

In world-building for my own books, I try very hard to start from the ground up, rather than seizing common European-style settings and tropes, unless I want to use them for a deliberate reason. And The Dawn of Everything pushes against this Euro-centric worldview even harder, arguing that most assumptions we make about various types of historic societies are wrong, and our current paradigm is only a fleeting, non-representative creation.

I was especially fascinated to learn that… show more.

This incredibly readable work of anthropological discovery helps put a bow on the last 40 years of research on the topic of who we are and how we got here.

The most incredible takeaway is that we didn’t have to end up in a world of nation-states, that throughout pre-history and beyond, there have been people and cultures that were truly egalitarian and humanistic, and that we can become that way again.

It’s one of my favorite books of non-fiction ever because it gives me hope that perhaps our children or their children will remake a better world.

What ideas do you have about what the first peoples were like, and how human society developed?

Maybe you’ve even read the popular authors on this topic such as Diamond, Harari, Pinker, Hobbes, and Rousseau. Prepare to have all of your notions and received opinions upended and turned to dust by David Graeber (a man universally acknowledged as a genius) and the book he worked on for the last ten years of his life, which brings revolutionary ideas to 30,000 years of civilization.

As a serial freelancer with an uneasy relationship to authority, one of my small obsessions is freedom (and how I can achieve it whilst still earning money). Because freedom is a theme in my life it's also a theme I seek out in the stories we tell ourselves.

Here's a story. Once upon, a time we subsisted in small roving bands and all lived in a kind of anarchy. Either that was a good thing (Rousseau) or a very unpleasant one (Hobbes). And then, with an agricultural revolution, came a change. More settled people and, later, more people still in… show more.

Everything we’ve been taught about the rise of so-called civilization – that it originated in early city-states built on agriculture, and required by its very nature inequality and hierarchy – is wrong.

David Graeber, an anthropologist, and David Wengrow, an archaeologist, leave conventional wisdom behind and take us through what the data actually show about the past 30,000 years of human societies. 

Full of surprises, this is a book that leads to radical thinking about our possible futures.