Discipline and Punish

Though Foucault’s book appeared at almost the same moment as Ignatieff’s, Foucault painted a far darker image of early penitentiaries. He cast them not as places of reform but as instruments of disciplinary control, rendering inmates docile and amenable to the monastic repression and routine of schools and factories.

Foucault’s book taught me decades ago that history is crafted, not discovered, and that skilled chroniclers can weave very different plotlines from similar facts.

This book has perhaps the best opening of any history book ever written. This is a detailed and gruesome description of the public torture and mutilation of Robert-François Damien in 1757.

The description is meant to shock, for it illustrates the difference between a modern attitude towards punishment and the idea of punishment that prevailed in the French ancien régime before the Revolution of 1789. Today we generally see punishment not as a means to display the state’s anger against those who defy its authority but rather as a means to improve society and even rehabilitate the offender.

This book… show more.

I have always tended to see power as something that is imposed upon us. It is done to us. And, of course, you only need to glance at the Internet or a TV screen to see the truth of that.

But that can't be the extent of it. Power requires consent, which means it must also be at play even when it is not actively exercised.

Discipline and Punish is a work of history and philosophy which charts the evolution of punishment from a spectacle of cruelty in the middle ages, to the impersonal bureaucratic systems of the modern era.… show more.