When writing my first of my ten books on the Founding Era, A Peopleās History of the American Revolution, I came across an amazing uprising not celebrated in the traditional saga of our nationās birth: the people of Massachusetts, everywhere outside of Boston, actually cast off British authority in 1774, the year beforeLexington and Concord. How could this critical episode have been so neglected? Whoās the gatekeeper here, anyway? Thatās when I began to explore how events of those times morphed into stories, and how those stories mask what actually happenedāthe theme of Founding Myths.
I wrote
Founding Myths: Stories That Hide Our Patriotic Past
This book is a game changer. In the traditional telling of the American Revolution, rebellious colonists were the sole agents, save for a bit of help from France. Here, scholars from Spain, Great Britain, Belgium, the Netherlands, Germany, France, and India, as well as the United States, broaden our perspective. The volume is lavishly produced with historical artwork by the Smithsonian, but this is no ordinary coffee table book. In vivid detail, you will learn that from its very outset, our nation was not a world unto itself. From the nearby Caribbean to Europe to far-away India, the American Revolution played out on a global stage.
An illustrated collection of essays that explores the international dimensions of the American Revolution and its legacies in both America and around the world
The American Revolution: A World War argues that contrary to popular opinion, the American Revolution was not just a simple battle for independence in which the American colonists waged a "David versus Goliath" fight to overthrow their British rulers. Instead, the essays in the book illustrate how the American Revolution was a much more complicated and interesting conflict. It was an extension of larger skirmishes among the global superpowers in Europe, chiefly Britain, Spain, France, andā¦
You might or might not have read about Alexander McGillivray, the controversial Creek diplomat, but how about Payamataha, Oliver Pollack, Petit Jean, Amand Broussard, or James Bruce? They were, respectively: Chickasaw leader who tried to keep his people out of the war; merchant and the Continental Congressās agent in Louisiana; slave from Mobile who spied for Spain; Cajun militiaman seeking revenge against the British for deporting his people; member of His Majestyās Council for West Florida. Weaving her narrative around this diverse cast and little-known cross-cultural encounters in the Gulf region, DuVal explores āthe changing power dynamics of the entire continent, not just the thirteen British colonies that eventually rebelled.ā
A rising-star historian offers a significant new global perspective on the Revolutionary War with the story of the conflict as seen through the eyes of the outsiders of colonial society
Winner of the Journal of the American Revolution Book of the Year Award ā¢ Winner of the Society of the Cincinnati in the State of New Jersey History Prize ā¢ Finalist for the George Washington Book Prize
Over the last decade, award-winning historian Kathleen DuVal has revitalized the study of early Americaās marginalized voices. Now, in Independence Lost, she recounts an untold story as rich and significant as that ofā¦
This memoir chronicles the lives of three generations of women with a passion for reading, writing, and travel. The story begins in 1992 in an unfinished attic in Brooklyn as the author reads a notebook written by her grandmother nearly 100 years earlier. This sets her on a 30-year searchā¦
If, perchance, you have yet to encounter Private Joseph Plumb Martinās classic memoir, stop right now and get hold of a copy. With wit, charm, and telling detail, this common soldier from the Continental Army will take you on a personal journey through the Revolutionary War. Lest we forget, āhistoryā is composed of individual experiences, and JPMs are memorable. āGreat men get great praise; little men, nothing,ā he wrote. āIt always was so and always will be.ā No, not always. This ālittle manā earns praise not only for himself, but for all those men and boys who put their lives on the line in the Revolutionary War.
This classic collection of essays is an absolute gem. Writing in the
aftermath of the Vietnam War, Shy reminds us that our own struggle for
independence also demonstrated a āvisceral, ugly, face-to-face qualityā
that affected civilians as well as combatants. However harsh his subject
matter, Shy is such a brilliant writer that heās a pleasure to read.
These insightful zingers speak for themselves:
āA reservoir, sand in the gears, the militia looked like a great spongy
mass that could be pushed aside or maimed temporarily but that had no
vital center and could not be destroyed.ā
āOnce common folk had seen and even taken part in hounding, humiliating,
perhaps killing men known to them as social superiors, they could not
easily re-acquire the unthinking respect for wealth and status that
underpinned the old order.ā
āMuch about the event called the Revolutionary War had been very painful
and was unpleasant to remember. Only the outcome was unqualifiedly
pleasant, so memory, as ever, began to play tricks with the event.ā
Americans like to think of themselves as a peaceful and peace-loving people, and in remembering their own revolutionary past, American historians have long tended to focus on colonial origins and Constitutional aftermath, neglecting the fact that the American Revolution was a long, hard war. In this book, John Shy shifts the focus to the Revolutionary War and explores the ways in which the experience of that war was entangled with both the causes and the consequences of the Revolution itself. This is not a traditional military chronicle of battles and campaigns, but a series of essays that recapture the social,ā¦
Katya Cengel became a patient at the Roth Psychosomatic Unit at Children's Hospital at Stanford in 1986. She was 10 years old. Thirty years later Katya, now a journalist, discovers her young age was not the only thing that made her hospital stay unusual. The idea of psychosomatic units themselves,ā¦
What about wives left behind when their husbands marched off to war? This neglected gem showcases the letters between Joseph Hodgkins, a Minuteman who answered the Lexington Alarm, and his wife Sarah, at home with three small children. Joseph reenlists, not once but twice: āIf we Due not Exarte our selves in this gloris. Cause our all is gon and we made slaves of for Ever.ā But with each succeeding term, Sarahās letters become more heart-wrenching: āYou may think I am too free in expressing my mind. I look for you almost every day but I dont alow myself to depend on anything for I find there is nothing to be depended upon but troble and disapointments. I hope you will Let Some body else take your Place.ā Can such a marriage survive?
"As I am ingaged in this glories Cause I am will to go whare I am Called"-so Joseph Hodgkins, a shoemaker of Ipswich, Massachusetts, declared to his wife the purpose that sustained him through four crucial years of the American Revolution. Hodgkins and his fellow townsman Nathaniel Wade, a carpenter, turned out for the Lexington alarm, fought at Bunker Hill, retreated from Long Island past White Plains, attacked at Trenton and Princeton, and enjoyed triumph at Saratoga. One of them wintered at Valley Forge, and the other was promoted to command at West Point on the night that Benedict Arnoldā¦
Stories of the American Revolution were first communicated by word of mouth, and these folkloric renditions, infinitely malleable, provided fertile ground for the invention of history: āOne if by land, two if by sea.ā āDo not fire till you see the whites of their eyes.ā āGive me liberty or give me death!ā We know the litany well, but such tales reflect the romantic individualism of the Nineteenth Century, when they were popularized in childrenās books, and they sell our country short. Founding Myths reveals a deeper, richer national heritage. āGovernment has devolved upon the people,ā wrote one disgruntled Tory in 1774, āand they seem to be for using it.ā Yes, indeed. Thatās a story we do not have to conjure, and what an epic it is.
An inspiring, hilarious, and much-needed approach to addiction and self-acceptance,
Youāre Doing Great! debunks the myth that alcohol washes away the pain; explains the toll alcohol takes on our emotional, physical, and spiritual well-being; illustrates the steps to deal with our problems head-on; exposes the practices usedā¦
This is a novel about choices. How would you have chosen to act during the Second World War if your country had been invaded and occupied by a brutal enemy determined to isolate and murder a whole community?
Thatās the situation facing an ordinary family man with two children, aā¦