To share your reaction on this item, open the Amazon app from the App Store or Google Play on your phone.
Add Prime to get Fast, Free delivery
Amazon prime logo
Buy new:
-36% $11.49
FREE delivery Friday, January 24 on orders shipped by Amazon over $35
Ships from: Amazon.com
Sold by: Amazon.com
$11.49 with 36 percent savings
List Price: $18.00
Get Fast, Free Shipping with Amazon Prime FREE Returns
FREE delivery Friday, January 24 on orders shipped by Amazon over $35
Or Prime members get FREE delivery Tuesday, January 21. Order within 1 hr 5 mins.
In Stock
$$11.49 () Includes selected options. Includes initial monthly payment and selected options. Details
Price
Subtotal
$$11.49
Subtotal
Initial payment breakdown
Shipping cost, delivery date, and order total (including tax) shown at checkout.
Ships from
Amazon.com
Amazon.com
Ships from
Amazon.com
Sold by
Amazon.com
Amazon.com
Sold by
Amazon.com
Returns
30-day refund/replacement
30-day refund/replacement
This item can be returned in its original condition for a full refund or replacement within 30 days of receipt.
Payment
Secure transaction
Your transaction is secure
We work hard to protect your security and privacy. Our payment security system encrypts your information during transmission. We don’t share your credit card details with third-party sellers, and we don’t sell your information to others. Learn more
$10.12
Get Fast, Free Shipping with Amazon Prime FREE Returns
FREE delivery January 29 - February 2 on orders shipped by Amazon over $35
Or fastest delivery January 26 - 30
$$11.49 () Includes selected options. Includes initial monthly payment and selected options. Details
Price
Subtotal
$$11.49
Subtotal
Initial payment breakdown
Shipping cost, delivery date, and order total (including tax) shown at checkout.
Access codes and supplements are not guaranteed with used items.
Kindle app logo image

Download the free Kindle app and start reading Kindle books instantly on your smartphone, tablet, or computer - no Kindle device required.

Read instantly on your browser with Kindle for Web.

Using your mobile phone camera - scan the code below and download the Kindle app.

QR code to download the Kindle App

Follow the author

Something went wrong. Please try your request again later.

Amusing Ourselves to Death: Public Discourse in the Age of Show Business Paperback – December 27, 2005

4.6 4.6 out of 5 stars 3,719 ratings

{"desktop_buybox_group_1":[{"displayPrice":"$11.49","priceAmount":11.49,"currencySymbol":"$","integerValue":"11","decimalSeparator":".","fractionalValue":"49","symbolPosition":"left","hasSpace":false,"showFractionalPartIfEmpty":true,"offerListingId":"MPX3SyKiywu7oypkZhFXTBNFw%2Bw74eDFYtBDGwuRA50g2A9PvYXeimO6nJZg6csqjOpI7Ehc8rDCsXBPYgVJO23ItfXfECTPRGy%2BFB0h%2F%2Be51dZ7iNmTm%2FMAUwufND0bHA1IpgtMPxc%3D","locale":"en-US","buyingOptionType":"NEW","aapiBuyingOptionIndex":0}, {"displayPrice":"$10.12","priceAmount":10.12,"currencySymbol":"$","integerValue":"10","decimalSeparator":".","fractionalValue":"12","symbolPosition":"left","hasSpace":false,"showFractionalPartIfEmpty":true,"offerListingId":"MPX3SyKiywu7oypkZhFXTBNFw%2Bw74eDFjs0OuXG8xD%2FOfZ%2BpDZdsjo5vgudhl1CdFBD%2FWuiu9MB151leh5WMaHnZ0yjTagyxJlFT2Ew0YhbZaJ%2FEZbS0O4%2FGoezYvX8zM9U82nMFS6nUpqTL5XlNl38YDFCBEOJdtJZiWiQFkUTlRQrUy36A7FQ9D6k7IuXU","locale":"en-US","buyingOptionType":"USED","aapiBuyingOptionIndex":1}]}

Purchase options and add-ons

What happens when media and politics become forms of entertainment? As our world begins to look more and more like Orwell's 1984, Neil's Postman's essential guide to the modern media is more relevant than ever.

"It's unlikely that Trump has ever read Amusing Ourselves to Death, but his ascent would not have surprised Postman.” -CNN

Originally published in 1985, Neil Postman’s groundbreaking polemic about the corrosive effects of television on our politics and public discourse has been hailed as a twenty-first-century book published in the twentieth century. Now, with television joined by more sophisticated electronic media—from the Internet to cell phones to DVDs—it has taken on even greater significance.
Amusing Ourselves to Death is a prophetic look at what happens when politics, journalism, education, and even religion become subject to the demands of  entertainment. It is also a blueprint for regaining control of our media, so that they can serve our highest goals.

“A brilliant, powerful, and important book. This is an indictment that Postman has laid down and, so far as I can see, an irrefutable one.” –Jonathan Yardley, 
The Washington Post Book World
Books with Buzz
Discover the latest buzz-worthy books, from mysteries and romance to humor and nonfiction. Explore more

Frequently bought together

This item: Amusing Ourselves to Death: Public Discourse in the Age of Show Business
$11.49
Get it as soon as Friday, Jan 24
In Stock
Ships from and sold by Amazon.com.
+
$12.89
Get it as soon as Friday, Jan 24
In Stock
Ships from and sold by Amazon.com.
+
$13.17
Get it as soon as Friday, Jan 24
In Stock
Ships from and sold by Amazon.com.
Total price: $00
To see our price, add these items to your cart.
Details
Added to Cart
spCSRF_Treatment
Choose items to buy together.
Popular Highlights in this book

Editorial Reviews

Review

“I can’t think of a more prophetic, more thoughtful, more necessary – and yes, more entertaining – book about media culture.” –Victor Navasky, National Book Award-winning author of The Art of Controversy

“All I can say about Neil Postman’s brilliant
Amusing Ourselves to Death is: Guilty As Charged.” –Matt Groening, Creator of The Simpsons

“As a fervent evangelist of the age of Hollywood, I publicly opposed Neil Postman’s dark picture of our media-saturated future. But time has proved Postman right. He accurately foresaw that the young would inherit a frantically all-consuming media culture of glitz, gossip, and greed.” –Camille Paglia

“A brilliant, powerful, and important book. This is an indictment that Postman has laid down and, so far as I can see, an irrefutable one.” –Jonathan Yardley,
The Washington Post Book World

About the Author

Neil Postman (1931–2003) was chairman of the Department of Communication Arts at New York University and founder of its Media Ecology program. He wrote more than twenty books.

Product details

  • Publisher ‏ : ‎ Penguin Books; Anniversary edition (December 27, 2005)
  • Language ‏ : ‎ English
  • Paperback ‏ : ‎ 208 pages
  • ISBN-10 ‏ : ‎ 014303653X
  • ISBN-13 ‏ : ‎ 978-0143036531
  • Item Weight ‏ : ‎ 2.31 pounds
  • Dimensions ‏ : ‎ 0.6 x 5.1 x 7.7 inches
  • Customer Reviews:
    4.6 4.6 out of 5 stars 3,719 ratings

About the author

Follow authors to get new release updates, plus improved recommendations.
Neil Postman
Brief content visible, double tap to read full content.
Full content visible, double tap to read brief content.

Neil Postman was chairman of the department of communication arts at New York University. He passed away in 2003.

Customer reviews

4.6 out of 5 stars
3,719 global ratings

Review this product

Share your thoughts with other customers

Customers say

Customers find the book insightful and well-written. They consider it relevant and entertaining. However, some readers found the content complex and needed two readings to fully understand.

AI-generated from the text of customer reviews

193 customers mention "Readability"184 positive9 negative

Customers find the book engaging and well-written. They say it's fascinating, insightful, and worth reading. Readers also mention that the stories are entertaining.

"...a book outside my usual reading patterns, but, I am glad to say I enjoyed this book, and can even call it an eye-opener, a paradigm shifter, and..." Read more

"...These are all entertaining stories to be sure, but what do they all have in common? For 99% of us, they have no impact on our daily lives...." Read more

"This was quite a pleasant and intellectual read...." Read more

"...a fascinating account of a time when books and reading dominated the attention of average Americans, when boys literally walked one hand on the plow..." Read more

150 customers mention "Insight"150 positive0 negative

Customers find the book insightful and relevant. They appreciate TV's ability to enhance their understanding of complex topics and its relevance today. The chapter on wasteful consumption is interesting and hauntingly appropriate. Readers mention the book provides an engaging critique of modern culture, while not disparaging it.

"...to say I enjoyed this book, and can even call it an eye-opener, a paradigm shifter, and even among the most compelling arguments I've ever read to..." Read more

"...really unpack and digest this section, the rest of this book becomes quite enlightening and the distinctions in his argument become more clear...." Read more

"There are only a few classics that aged so well and give a strong message to young generation...." Read more

"...But hang in there. Chapter three begins a fascinating account of a time when books and reading dominated the attention of average Americans, when..." Read more

84 customers mention "Word quality"72 positive12 negative

Customers find the book well-written and insightful. They appreciate the clear, compelling arguments and the author's careful reasoning. The book is easy to understand and relevant today as when it was written.

"...Consider the act of reading, how it encourages "rationality" and how confronting a page of symbols requires a person to "understand"...." Read more

"...writing is geared towards conceptual thinking, sequential order, careful reasoning, objectivity, and a delayed response, television is meant for..." Read more

"...of this book becomes quite enlightening and the distinctions in his argument become more clear...." Read more

"Easy to read" Read more

29 customers mention "Relevance"29 positive0 negative

Customers find the book relevant today. They say the information is applicable and pertinent to society today. The book is considered relevant for today's times and an important book of the 20th century.

"...Throughout the book is an interesting interplay between Huxley's Brave New World and Orwell's 1984...." Read more

"...Even though it was published almost 30 years ago, it's very applicable even today." Read more

"Replaced an old copy I lost years ago. Still a classic! Good read." Read more

"Very appropriate for today's times...." Read more

24 customers mention "Entertainment value"24 positive0 negative

Customers find the book entertaining and a must-read for those interested in modern show business. They describe it as a humorous and insightful critique of entertainment culture.

"...Is he entertaining? Absolutely—he is the most entertaining politician we have ever had in the age of television and I personally am not surprised at..." Read more

"...He takes many satirical jabs at American politics which in a fit of irony even he could not predict totally came to fruition 20 years later...." Read more

"...Television is good for trite shows, but bad when trying to display rational discourse...." Read more

"Remarkable content This book gave me more insight in the power of television, the warnings of George Orwell and Aldous Huxley...." Read more

19 customers mention "Pacing"16 positive3 negative

Customers find the book's pacing good. They say it offers insightful and logical views on the dangers of entertainment to the civic community. The material is still relevant and alarming, and the book has a well-written and protected cover.

"...on the national conversation is the most relevant, insightful and critical warning that every generation must heed...." Read more

"...me more insight in the power of television, the warnings of George Orwell and Aldous Huxley...." Read more

"...The material is still relevant and , in fact, goes a long ways towards explaining the lack of depth in today's political discourse." Read more

"The book is well protected when arrive, nice product!" Read more

10 customers mention "Dated content"4 positive6 negative

Customers have mixed opinions about the dated content. Some find it timeless and relevant, while others say it's a bit dated but well-written.

"...The bulk of the book is a little dated now that even television viewership is declining in favor of social media and the internet, but the book..." Read more

"This was required reading for my son's AP Government class. Granted, it's old and we have the benefit of hindsight to know that Postman's dire..." Read more

"...Written in 1985, it is a little dated but one can replace the discussion of television with the internet and comprehend Postman’s observations...." Read more

"This book was written in 1985 and is even more relevant today. Highly recommended." Read more

11 customers mention "Comprehension"0 positive11 negative

Customers find the book difficult to understand. They find it complex and dense in the beginning, with long explanations that make it hard to follow. The first chapter or two are also criticized for being too dense.

"...Therefore, that which permits no complexity and no abstraction, which can only fragment and flash partial accounts in short segments became our..." Read more

"...The first chapter or two is pretty dense but after that it really gets moving. Definitely gave me a lot of food for thought." Read more

"...from faulty premises to smug but incorrect conclusions with not a smidge of logic along the way...." Read more

"...so the sentences are full of meaning, aka it took me two readings to understand fully. Postman makes great points and it is worthwhile...." Read more

literature teaches, television entertains
5 out of 5 stars
literature teaches, television entertains
In January of 1776, Thomas Paine published a book called Common Sense: The Origin and Design of Government. It sold 100,000 copies in the first two months. Today, a book would have to sell 11,000,000 copies to match the proportion of the population that Paine’s book reached. Common Sense went on to print somewhere between 300,000-400,000 copies, equivalent to somewhere between 33,000,000-44,000,000 people today. As Postman notes in Amusing Ourselves to Death, the “only communication event that could produce such collective attention in today’s America is the Superbowl.”In the mid 1800s, Abraham Lincoln and one of his political adversaries (Stephen A. Douglas) used to have public debates that lasted hours. Each participant would get a minimum of an hour of speaking time before the other rose for a rebuttal, and debates could often last upwards of 4 hours. What is even more remarkable is that the audience of regular common people was rapt with attention for the entire affair. Today, politicians are given 1 minute to give an opinion on a major issue and their opponent is expected to keep their rebuttal to 30 seconds.So, there is a definitive difference in the mainstream intelligence of people from our past in comparison to people today. How did this come to be? Postman posits that it is due to the rise of television as our main source of information gathering. In the 17th and 18th centuries ideas were shared via writing (and if you go back father, to the days of humanity before writing and reading were wide-spread, when ideas were only shared orally, the scholars and politicians of the day were those select men with a knack for oratorical skills.) Postman notes how the first fifteen presidents of the United States most likely wouldn’t have been recognized by their citizens on the street, yet those same citizens could have identified them by their latest speech or piece of distributed writing. Today, things are quite different. Postman wrote this book in the 1980’s when Ronald Reagan was president—a man who was previously a big time Hollywood actor in the 1960s and built a national reputation as someone on the silver screen. Even more recently we endured the presidency of Donald Trump, the former host of a reality television series. Was Donald Trump a good politician? The debate is still out. Is he entertaining? Absolutely—he is the most entertaining politician we have ever had in the age of television and I personally am not surprised at all that he is the most popular politician in the United States right now.The core argument of Postman’s book is not only that television changed how we receive information, but it changed our entire relationship to information on an epistemological level. Whereas writing is geared towards conceptual thinking, sequential order, careful reasoning, objectivity, and a delayed response, television is meant for entertainment. Television, with its constantly moving pictures and engaging sound effects, is meant to be amusing. When we indulge in TV for entertainment’s sake, sinking into the couch after a hard day’s work to watch our favorite half hour comedy, that is not the TV that Postman is talking about. The TV that has decimated attention spans and amused us to a breaking point is the TV that has infiltrated our religions, our politics, and our education systems. “As a television show, and a good one,” Postman writes, “Sesame Street does not encourage children to love school or anything about school. It encourages them to love television.”With television’s incorporation of the news cycle, our ways of learning about the world are also stunted. We get a story about the Middle East, and then a minute later we’re hearing about gridlock in the Senate, quickly followed by a story about a dog riding a crocodile in Florida. These are all entertaining stories to be sure, but what do they all have in common? For 99% of us, they have no impact on our daily lives. Do I wish there was less violence in the Middle East? Of course. What can I actually do about it? Essentially nothing. With all the graphic images and sounds coming out of the television screen, however, it is incredibly engaging and I can’t look away!Television is designed to make everything it touches entertaining, and it has infiltrated our culture so much so that with the advancement of the internet and social media, the trends in this book have only exacerbated. “The form in which ideas are expressed affects what those idea will be,” Postman writes, and I couldn’t agree more. We the people now expect everything in life, whether it be news, politics, science, education, commerce, religion, etc., to entertain us. If it doesn’t, we don’t want it. Personally, I believe that our culture would benefit tremendously from a return to typography—a large part of the reason why I started reading and writing book reviews in the first place. Books are where real education lies, and in my opinion a better education is the way towards a better future. The internet has recently made huge swaths of information readily available (thanks Wikipedia!) so we now must take focus from what we are learning and return focus to how we go about learning it.
Thank you for your feedback
Sorry, there was an error
Sorry we couldn't load the review

Top reviews from the United States

  • Reviewed in the United States on July 16, 2013
    "Americans no longer talk to each other, they entertain each other. They do not exchange ideas, they exchange images. They do not argue with propositions; they argue with good looks, celebrities and commercials." -Neil Postman

    Amusing Ourselves To Death: Public Discourse In the Age of Showbusiness by Neil Postman is a book outside my usual reading patterns, but, I am glad to say I enjoyed this book, and can even call it an eye-opener, a paradigm shifter, and even among the most compelling arguments I've ever read to think carefully and cautiously about the direction our culture is headed. If you are a Cinema Media Arts major, a Business Marketing major, a Theater Arts major, a History major, or just a person that wants to think about how media affects us, this book is a mandatory read.

    Neil Postman argues that the things we love: technology, television, radio, computers, and the internet, all things we are entertained by, have and will turn our society into a vacuum of "absurdity" and "irrelevance" if they go unchecked.

    "Orwell warns that we will be overcome by an externally imposed oppression. But in Huxley's vision, no Big Brother is required to deprive people of their autonomy, maturity and history. As he saw it, people will come to love their oppression, to adore the technologies that undo their capacities to think."

    If you don't agree, consider these basic questions: When was the last time you had a "deep" conversation? How often do you discuss "ideas" as opposed to "trivialities" with your friends? Does "public discourse" (conversations) seem more emotion-based or logic-based? Why in the world is this happening, because, historically speaking, this is not normal.

    "The Medium Is The Message"

    If you've ever listened to Pink Floyd's Amused To Death, or better yet, Switchfoot's Selling The News, both of those songs are based off of this book, showing the importance of this book, at least to modern alternative and rock music bands. Both these songs mention the phrase: "The medium is the message".

    In other words, the medium (tool) that our culture uses to communicate (Newspapers or TV) with ourselves and with each other will determine the content and quality of the message (of what is being communicated). In short, the form of communication determines the content and quality of what is being communicated. There are largely three cultural mediums that cultures have used to communicate, 1.) speech-centered (think B.C. when the printing press wasn't around and all people could do was tell stories and communicate by word of mouth), 2.) print-centered (think books, print newspapers, pamphlets, etc.), and 3.) image-centered (think televisions, the internet, and magazines...)

    A Monumental Shift

    In our age, we are experiencing a monumental shift in "mediums" of communication, and as the phrase goes, the "message" is being changed as well. The "Age of Exposition" as Postman calls it, which was America from it's conception to the 1960′s, was marked by a national fervor to read books. The "Age of Show-business" as Postman calls it, is marked by a national fervor to watch images on a screen.

    Consider the act of reading, how it encourages "rationality" and how confronting a page of symbols requires a person to "understand". It demands solemn response rather than impulsive reaction. This is so, mainly because,

    "to engage the written word means to follow a line of thought, which requires considerable powers of classifying, inference-making and reasoning. It means to uncover lies, confusions, and over-generalizations, to detect abuses of logic and common sense. It also means to weigh ideas, to compare and contrast assertions, to connect one generalization to another..."

    Reading forms your mind like a potter forms clay, into a logical, reasoning, discerning, deducing, powerful machine.

    In the America of the 1800′s people would listen to political speeches, such as the Lincoln-Douglas Debates which lasted for seven hours at time, just for fun, and it wasn't uncommon to find a crowd of people surrounding a person giving an intellectual oration on a dead tree stump. Lecture halls spanned the 50 states where throngs of people would line up and pay money, sometimes upwards of $200 to hear public intellectuals of the day, such as Ralph Waldo Emerson, for hours, and they did that just like we watch movies at a theater today. Clearly our intention-span has diminished a great deal, and our focus has turned from intellectuality to entertainment, almost 180 degrees.

    The TV

    The introduction of the TV has affected the minds and hearts of our culture greatly. Consider the difference between watching TV and reading a book, how watching short snippets of presentations, where the hook comes around and around to entice our emotions, while reading demands sitting for long periods of time, where the author means everything he says and is appealing to our logic and reason. TV pulls us from the past to a perpetual present where it sells you each second you're watching by "appealing to your passions", reading pulls us from the present to the wide scope of history, past, present, and future and sells us not with passions but with sound arguments and logical appeals. The abdication of the second means a culture largely driven by emotions, passions, and enticing images rather than sound arguments, logic, and careful reasoning.

    "With television, we vault ourselves into a continuous, incoherent present."

    Christianity

    What really caught my interest was Postman's analysis of the affect of Television on religion, particularly Christianity. The Christian Revivals of the early days of America were headed by religious intellectual giants like Jonathan Edwards and George Whitefield, but the religious Revivals of today are led by religious show entertainers with shallow doctrines and emotional appeals.

    "It would be a serious mistake to think of Billy Graham or any other television revivalist as a latter-day Jonathan Edwards or Charles Finney. Edwards was one of the most brilliant and creative minds ever produced by America. His contribution to aesthetic theory was almost as important as his contribution to theology. His interests were mostly academic; he spent long hours each day in his study. He did not speak to his audiences extemporaneously. He read his sermons, which were tightly knit and closely reasoned expositions of theological doctrine...religious thought and institutions in America were dominated by an austere, learned, and intellectual form of discourse that is largely absent from religious life today."

    "I believe I am not mistaken in saying that Christianity is a demanding and serious religion. When it is delivered as easy and amusing, it is another kind of religion altogether."

    Too Much News

    Are you tired of reading the news? I am, and I believe Postman is absolutely correct in his analysis that the advent of the telegraph made everything relevant or irrelevant into "news", whether it be Snoop Dog changing his name to Snoop Lion, the reoccurring event that some new celebrity insanity has shaved her head, or the ridiculous name of the baby of some movie actress marriage that only lasts for a year. All news is news whether it is irrelevant to us or not.

    "...most of our daily news is inert, consisting of information that gives us something to talk about but cannot lead to any meaningful action."

    What Can We Do?

    The inevitable question is: What can we do to put a stop to this degeneration of culture?

    The answer is simple: Think!

    This involves actually reading books, and teaching yourself to analyze rather than just accepting TV. You cannot get by today without reading good books. Reading is the process and practice of ordering, analyzing, discerning, categorizing, and reasoning and you cannot be an intelligent person if you do not have a healthy intake of good challenging books.

    "But it is much later in the game now, and ignorance of the score is inexcusable. To be unaware that a technology comes equipped with a program for social change, to maintain that technology is neutral, to make the assumption that technology is always a friend to culture is, at this late hour, stupidity plain and simple."

    Is This Just Culture Whining?

    One possible objection to reading this book is: isn't this just another person whining about the ills of society and banging their cup against the ground in objection? Fair enough, I asked the same question when reading this book, several times.

    Consider how we are adamantly opposed to external slavery as a nation. We broke away from tyranny from the start and we have been a nation of "freedom" and "liberty" ever since. It is not culture whining to decry an externally caused force of tyranny. This is the same tyrrany all the same, it is just disguised as an internal form of slavery, where our desires control us, and our own passions turn our culture into slaves of our own trivialities.

    "Everything in our background has prepared us to know and resist a prison when the gates begin to close around us . . . But what if there are no cries of anguish to be heard? Who is prepared to take arms against a sea of amusements? To whom do we complain, and when, and in what tone of voice, when serious discourse dissolves into giggles? What is the antidote to a culture's being drained by laughter?"
    148 people found this helpful
    Report
  • Reviewed in the United States on July 8, 2021
    In January of 1776, Thomas Paine published a book called Common Sense: The Origin and Design of Government. It sold 100,000 copies in the first two months. Today, a book would have to sell 11,000,000 copies to match the proportion of the population that Paine’s book reached. Common Sense went on to print somewhere between 300,000-400,000 copies, equivalent to somewhere between 33,000,000-44,000,000 people today. As Postman notes in Amusing Ourselves to Death, the “only communication event that could produce such collective attention in today’s America is the Superbowl.”

    In the mid 1800s, Abraham Lincoln and one of his political adversaries (Stephen A. Douglas) used to have public debates that lasted hours. Each participant would get a minimum of an hour of speaking time before the other rose for a rebuttal, and debates could often last upwards of 4 hours. What is even more remarkable is that the audience of regular common people was rapt with attention for the entire affair. Today, politicians are given 1 minute to give an opinion on a major issue and their opponent is expected to keep their rebuttal to 30 seconds.

    So, there is a definitive difference in the mainstream intelligence of people from our past in comparison to people today. How did this come to be? Postman posits that it is due to the rise of television as our main source of information gathering. In the 17th and 18th centuries ideas were shared via writing (and if you go back father, to the days of humanity before writing and reading were wide-spread, when ideas were only shared orally, the scholars and politicians of the day were those select men with a knack for oratorical skills.) Postman notes how the first fifteen presidents of the United States most likely wouldn’t have been recognized by their citizens on the street, yet those same citizens could have identified them by their latest speech or piece of distributed writing. Today, things are quite different. Postman wrote this book in the 1980’s when Ronald Reagan was president—a man who was previously a big time Hollywood actor in the 1960s and built a national reputation as someone on the silver screen. Even more recently we endured the presidency of Donald Trump, the former host of a reality television series. Was Donald Trump a good politician? The debate is still out. Is he entertaining? Absolutely—he is the most entertaining politician we have ever had in the age of television and I personally am not surprised at all that he is the most popular politician in the United States right now.

    The core argument of Postman’s book is not only that television changed how we receive information, but it changed our entire relationship to information on an epistemological level. Whereas writing is geared towards conceptual thinking, sequential order, careful reasoning, objectivity, and a delayed response, television is meant for entertainment. Television, with its constantly moving pictures and engaging sound effects, is meant to be amusing. When we indulge in TV for entertainment’s sake, sinking into the couch after a hard day’s work to watch our favorite half hour comedy, that is not the TV that Postman is talking about. The TV that has decimated attention spans and amused us to a breaking point is the TV that has infiltrated our religions, our politics, and our education systems. “As a television show, and a good one,” Postman writes, “Sesame Street does not encourage children to love school or anything about school. It encourages them to love television.”

    With television’s incorporation of the news cycle, our ways of learning about the world are also stunted. We get a story about the Middle East, and then a minute later we’re hearing about gridlock in the Senate, quickly followed by a story about a dog riding a crocodile in Florida. These are all entertaining stories to be sure, but what do they all have in common? For 99% of us, they have no impact on our daily lives. Do I wish there was less violence in the Middle East? Of course. What can I actually do about it? Essentially nothing. With all the graphic images and sounds coming out of the television screen, however, it is incredibly engaging and I can’t look away!

    Television is designed to make everything it touches entertaining, and it has infiltrated our culture so much so that with the advancement of the internet and social media, the trends in this book have only exacerbated. “The form in which ideas are expressed affects what those idea will be,” Postman writes, and I couldn’t agree more. We the people now expect everything in life, whether it be news, politics, science, education, commerce, religion, etc., to entertain us. If it doesn’t, we don’t want it. Personally, I believe that our culture would benefit tremendously from a return to typography—a large part of the reason why I started reading and writing book reviews in the first place. Books are where real education lies, and in my opinion a better education is the way towards a better future. The internet has recently made huge swaths of information readily available (thanks Wikipedia!) so we now must take focus from what we are learning and return focus to how we go about learning it.
    Customer image
    5.0 out of 5 stars literature teaches, television entertains
    Reviewed in the United States on July 8, 2021
    In January of 1776, Thomas Paine published a book called Common Sense: The Origin and Design of Government. It sold 100,000 copies in the first two months. Today, a book would have to sell 11,000,000 copies to match the proportion of the population that Paine’s book reached. Common Sense went on to print somewhere between 300,000-400,000 copies, equivalent to somewhere between 33,000,000-44,000,000 people today. As Postman notes in Amusing Ourselves to Death, the “only communication event that could produce such collective attention in today’s America is the Superbowl.”

    In the mid 1800s, Abraham Lincoln and one of his political adversaries (Stephen A. Douglas) used to have public debates that lasted hours. Each participant would get a minimum of an hour of speaking time before the other rose for a rebuttal, and debates could often last upwards of 4 hours. What is even more remarkable is that the audience of regular common people was rapt with attention for the entire affair. Today, politicians are given 1 minute to give an opinion on a major issue and their opponent is expected to keep their rebuttal to 30 seconds.

    So, there is a definitive difference in the mainstream intelligence of people from our past in comparison to people today. How did this come to be? Postman posits that it is due to the rise of television as our main source of information gathering. In the 17th and 18th centuries ideas were shared via writing (and if you go back father, to the days of humanity before writing and reading were wide-spread, when ideas were only shared orally, the scholars and politicians of the day were those select men with a knack for oratorical skills.) Postman notes how the first fifteen presidents of the United States most likely wouldn’t have been recognized by their citizens on the street, yet those same citizens could have identified them by their latest speech or piece of distributed writing. Today, things are quite different. Postman wrote this book in the 1980’s when Ronald Reagan was president—a man who was previously a big time Hollywood actor in the 1960s and built a national reputation as someone on the silver screen. Even more recently we endured the presidency of Donald Trump, the former host of a reality television series. Was Donald Trump a good politician? The debate is still out. Is he entertaining? Absolutely—he is the most entertaining politician we have ever had in the age of television and I personally am not surprised at all that he is the most popular politician in the United States right now.

    The core argument of Postman’s book is not only that television changed how we receive information, but it changed our entire relationship to information on an epistemological level. Whereas writing is geared towards conceptual thinking, sequential order, careful reasoning, objectivity, and a delayed response, television is meant for entertainment. Television, with its constantly moving pictures and engaging sound effects, is meant to be amusing. When we indulge in TV for entertainment’s sake, sinking into the couch after a hard day’s work to watch our favorite half hour comedy, that is not the TV that Postman is talking about. The TV that has decimated attention spans and amused us to a breaking point is the TV that has infiltrated our religions, our politics, and our education systems. “As a television show, and a good one,” Postman writes, “Sesame Street does not encourage children to love school or anything about school. It encourages them to love television.”

    With television’s incorporation of the news cycle, our ways of learning about the world are also stunted. We get a story about the Middle East, and then a minute later we’re hearing about gridlock in the Senate, quickly followed by a story about a dog riding a crocodile in Florida. These are all entertaining stories to be sure, but what do they all have in common? For 99% of us, they have no impact on our daily lives. Do I wish there was less violence in the Middle East? Of course. What can I actually do about it? Essentially nothing. With all the graphic images and sounds coming out of the television screen, however, it is incredibly engaging and I can’t look away!

    Television is designed to make everything it touches entertaining, and it has infiltrated our culture so much so that with the advancement of the internet and social media, the trends in this book have only exacerbated. “The form in which ideas are expressed affects what those idea will be,” Postman writes, and I couldn’t agree more. We the people now expect everything in life, whether it be news, politics, science, education, commerce, religion, etc., to entertain us. If it doesn’t, we don’t want it. Personally, I believe that our culture would benefit tremendously from a return to typography—a large part of the reason why I started reading and writing book reviews in the first place. Books are where real education lies, and in my opinion a better education is the way towards a better future. The internet has recently made huge swaths of information readily available (thanks Wikipedia!) so we now must take focus from what we are learning and return focus to how we go about learning it.
    Images in this review
    Customer image
    Customer image
    123 people found this helpful
    Report
  • Reviewed in the United States on May 22, 2020
    This was quite a pleasant and intellectual read. I have always heard McLuhan's famous "the medium is the message" quote but never fully grasped the meaning of it. Postman spends a lot of time explaining his epistemological arguments. If you can take some time to really unpack and digest this section, the rest of this book becomes quite enlightening and the distinctions in his argument become more clear. It is no surprise that this book has made a revival in recent years. He takes many satirical jabs at American politics which in a fit of irony even he could not predict totally came to fruition 20 years later. Some of these other reviewers are correct in that his point could have been summarized in probably half the length of this book and there is certainly some repetition but the book is quite short as it is so who cares
    3 people found this helpful
    Report

Top reviews from other countries

Translate all reviews to English
  • Amazon Customer
    5.0 out of 5 stars Perfect read
    Reviewed in Germany on November 20, 2024
    Must for all booklovers out there!
  • Scabrizio
    4.0 out of 5 stars Chiaramente traslabile all‘Internet dei social media
    Reviewed in Italy on July 23, 2023
    Offre spunti interessanti, si potrebbe riassumere in: le tecnologie determinano il modo in cui ci comportiamo e pensiamo. La televisione fa altrettanto e ciò rischia di minare le fondamenta della cultura che fonda le nostre democrazie, che é una cultura “tipografica”, cioè basata sul discorso scritto. Soluzione non puó però essere una televisione educativa, perché il medium è inadatto alla complessità, linearità, logicità, e astrazione che può assumere un testo scritto. La televisione è apodittica perché immagine. E l’immagine non può essere astrazione.
  • Kindle Customer
    5.0 out of 5 stars Still relevant today
    Reviewed in France on January 3, 2022
    Essays that are a few decades old can sometime fall into irrelevance, this is not the case here. A lot of the issues raised in this book from the golden age of television are still valid today in the age of social networks.
  • Cliente de Amazon
    5.0 out of 5 stars Excelente texto
    Reviewed in Mexico on January 13, 2019
    Si bien no es un texto actual, es un referente para los estudios en comunicación. Resulta de provecho para aquellos que investigan comunicación, política, sociología
    Customer image
    Cliente de Amazon
    5.0 out of 5 stars Excelente texto
    Reviewed in Mexico on January 13, 2019
    Si bien no es un texto actual, es un referente para los estudios en comunicación. Resulta de provecho para aquellos que investigan comunicación, política, sociología
    Images in this review
    Customer image
    Customer image
  • prakash
    5.0 out of 5 stars best book on television...if u watch 24 hr news or religious program ... must read
    Reviewed in India on August 26, 2020
    my first advice if you are a novice reader skip part 1 and complete part 2 of the book....after that read part1.
    this book is filled with funny yet serious knowledge about television..or for that matter youtube videos and channels that provide news,education,religion as entertainment...the bottom line is political discourse(discussion), education
    religion all depend on"language"..tv is totally "visual imagery" only good for entertainment...