-32% $23.67$23.67
$3.98 delivery May 23 - 30
Ships from: Mesilla Internet Sold by: Mesilla Internet
$11.95$11.95
Ships from: Amazon Sold by: The Duke of Books
Download the free Kindle app and start reading Kindle books instantly on your smartphone, tablet, or computer - no Kindle device required.
Read instantly on your browser with Kindle for Web.
Using your mobile phone camera - scan the code below and download the Kindle app.
OK
Thinking Big: How the Evolution of Social Life Shaped the Human Mind Hardcover – June 17, 2014
Purchase options and add-ons
A closer look at genealogy, incorporating how biological, anthropological, and technical factors can influence human lives
We are at a pivotal moment in understanding our remote ancestry and its implications for how we live today. The barriers to what we can know about our distant relatives have been falling as a result of scientific advance, such as decoding the genomes of humans and Neanderthals, and bringing together different perspectives to answer common questions. These collaborations have brought new knowledge and suggested fresh concepts to examine. The results have shaken the old certainties.The results are profound; not just for the study of the past but for appreciating why we conduct our social lives in ways, and at scales, that are familiar to all of us. But such basic familiarity raises a dilemma. When surrounded by the myriad technical and cultural innovations that support our global, urbanized lifestyles we can lose sight of the small social worlds we actually inhabit and that can be traced deep into our ancestry. So why do we need art, religion, music, kinship, myths, and all the other facets of our over-active imaginations if the reality of our effective social worlds is set by a limit of some one hundred and fifty partners (Dunbar’s number) made of family, friends, and useful acquaintances? How could such a social community lead to a city the size of London or a country as large as China? Do we really carry our hominin past into our human present? It is these small worlds, and the link they allow to the study of the past that forms the central point in this book. 40 black-and-white illustrations
- Print length224 pages
- LanguageEnglish
- PublisherThames & Hudson
- Publication dateJune 17, 2014
- Dimensions6.5 x 1 x 9.6 inches
- ISBN-100500051801
- ISBN-13978-0500051801
The Amazon Book Review
Book recommendations, author interviews, editors' picks, and more. Read it now.
Customers who bought this item also bought
Editorial Reviews
Review
― Ancient History Encyclopedia
About the Author
Clive Gamble is Professor of Archaeology at the University of Southampton. His publications include Origins and Revolutions: Human Identity in Earliest Prehistory (2007) and Archaeology: The Basics (2007).
John Gowlett is Professor of Archaeology at Liverpool University. He has published numerous articles and contributions within edited volumes.
Product details
- Publisher : Thames & Hudson; 1st edition (June 17, 2014)
- Language : English
- Hardcover : 224 pages
- ISBN-10 : 0500051801
- ISBN-13 : 978-0500051801
- Item Weight : 1.52 pounds
- Dimensions : 6.5 x 1 x 9.6 inches
- Best Sellers Rank: #3,282,360 in Books (See Top 100 in Books)
- #10,348 in Evolution (Books)
- #13,911 in Biology (Books)
- #18,810 in Ancient Civilizations
- Customer Reviews:
About the authors
Discover more of the author’s books, see similar authors, read author blogs and more
Discover more of the author’s books, see similar authors, read author blogs and more
Discover more of the author’s books, see similar authors, read author blogs and more
Customer reviews
Customer Reviews, including Product Star Ratings help customers to learn more about the product and decide whether it is the right product for them.
To calculate the overall star rating and percentage breakdown by star, we don’t use a simple average. Instead, our system considers things like how recent a review is and if the reviewer bought the item on Amazon. It also analyzed reviews to verify trustworthiness.
Learn more how customers reviews work on Amazon-
Top reviews
Top reviews from the United States
There was a problem filtering reviews right now. Please try again later.
Top reviews from other countries
The authors start from the Machiavellian intelligence hypothesis (we need large brains to be able to deceive others in our social group) to which Gamble et al counter with the social brain hypothesis. They claim that sophisticated social animals need to be able to mentalize (infer others state of mind) at high levels of sophistication and to understand complex social structure while maintaining cohesion. Laughter and music act as substitutes to grooming and are termed social grooming. Social grooming happens in our mind. And our mind is about being relational and not just rational. All social emotions (guilt, shame, pride) are only possible when a belief exists about another’s belief (mentalizing). By developing social structures and language we are also able to “store relationships”, which facilitates the creation of even larger social units. While language is furthermore driven by the necessity to accommodate interaction with “unobserved” others.
.....
It's a persuasive thesis. However, it is significant that this book does not represent a balanced synthesis of all the disciplines which have contributed to the "Social Brain" hypothesis. Rather, it emphasises the work of the 7 year long "Lucy to Language" project which focused on the archaeological evidence. and the book reflects the strengths and weaknesses of this emphasis.
Highlights include discussions of the exclusively hominid innovations of the use of fire and the technology of the handaxe. Less satisfactory is that evidence from extant models - particularly other primate cultures, and modern hunter-gatherer societies - is too often absent or inadequately considered. For example, the key graph establishing the relationship between neocortex size and group size includes points that appear to represent 19 monkey species and 3 (not 4?) great apes - but no point is identified on the graph and nowhere in the text is the specific social organisation of any one species described. Since some could include species like the baboon - which occupies precisely the same kind of savannah environment that the book suggests the earliest hominins did - this failure seems strange. Similarly, although the book describes the colonisation of the interior of Australia by Aboriginal humans, there is no discussion of their social organisation - instead, we are left with highly speculative suggestions from extremely scanty fossil hominin evidence. Just how precarious this evidence may be is indicated by the number of remarks that anywhere else would be casual asides, but here seem to be offered as actual evidence. For example, the discovery of a broken axe, found beside a pool with the handle close by the head, seems to be cited as evidence of the emotional disposition of Homo heidelbergensis - "Probably any modern human would have reacted to breaking a favourite tool- you or I might have reacted by throwing it into the pond. But H. heidelbergensis placidly left the two pieces side by side". Similarly, it is suggested that humans are able to maintain concentration on a task for longer periods than other primates as a result of our need to focus on others' mental states. No evidence is offered for this, beyond the following statement - "Chimpanzees are notoriously poor at concentration (except in prolonged bouts of gaining food), but humans can spend hours gazing into each other's eyes, solving a problem or listening to a sermon". The critical reader will immediately ask - "why is chimp's concentration disqualified? And when was the last time I gazed into another person's eyes *for hours*?" The bar for "evidence" here seems exceptionally low!
Part of the problem seems to be the insistence on human exceptionalism - "Truly, we are no longer apes" declares chapter one. But a closer and more sympathetic consideration of the behaviour and cognition of other apes actually makes the steps towards humanity easier. For example, when discussing the importance of social grooming, the authors assert that more abstract and particularly human forms of connection - such as music and laughter - are necessary to extend an emotional bond beyond a dyad, but doesn't that prompt the reader to think, "So what about wolves chorusing?" or to recall how chimpanzee females habitually groom males who have just fought each other so as manipulate them into grooming each other as a means of repairing social bonds?
By the end, my copy was bristling with post-its notes bearing double question marks and phrases beginning, "But what about....?!" But I kept reading, and am glad that I did. There is a great deal of thought-provoking and fascinating material here, and it's well worth the time.