From Publishers Weekly
Historians have offered many different explanations for the North's triumph over the South during the Civil War. In this work, the University of Kentucky's Freehling (The Road to Disunion) dissects the role played by a failure of border states (Maryland, Delaware, Missouri and Kentucky) to unify with the seceding states. As these border states developed an industrial economy (to replace their extinct tobacco-based economy), they became more similar culturally and politically to the North, he argues. And like most Northern whites, whites living in the border states were not as strongly against slavery as they were for preserving their own "lily-white utopia." Lincoln knew that in order to win the war, according to Freehling, he would have to appeal to the border states' desire to remain with the Union, and in order not to alienate them he had to maintain his ambiguous stance on slavery and emancipation. Moreover, Freehling claims, historians have failed to appreciate fully the corrosive effect runaway slaves had on the Confederacy's ability to promote its proslavery position among its border neighbors. Though the argument that runaway slaves and border-state whites were critical to the outcome of the war is not quite as new as Freehling makes it out to be, his discussion of these two groups together in one volume is a valuable contribution to Civil War literature. B&w illus. and maps. (Mar.)
Copyright 2001 Reed Business Information, Inc.
From Library Journal
The most recent work by Freehling (history and Otis A. Singletary Chair in Humanities, Univ. of Kentucky) examines causes and outcomes of the Civil War. His Prelude to Civil War analyzed the nullification crisis, while The Road to Disunion, Vol. 1: Secessionists at Bay, 1776-1854 examined the diversity of the South. Here, Freehling postulates that anti-Confederate Southerners, primarily border-state whites and Southern blacks, influenced military outcome by contributing thousands of troops to the Union cause, bolstered by Lincoln's exemplary and cunning statecraft, the Union's anaconda strategy, and the failure of Northern Democrats and foreigners to support the disunionists. This had a profound impact on the war, for the Confederacy needed both manpower and production capacity to realize its aims. Thoroughly and exquisitely researched, Freehling's analysis is provocative and novel. Maps of germane battles and places illustrate the text. Recommended for academic libraries. Kathleen M. Conley, Illinois State Univ., Normal
Copyright 2001 Reed Business Information, Inc.
The author of an award-winning study titled Secessionists at Bay 1776-1854 (1990), the first volume of his Road to Disunion, incisively argues how lethal opposition by Southerners was to the Confederate cause. Those Southern dissenters were unionists, on whom Lincoln initially banked to quench the fire-eaters who engineered secession in 1860-61. However impotent they were in restoring their states to the Union, the Southern anti-Confederates hampered the secessionist war effort in many ways. Freehling points out those ways and forcefully stresses that Lincoln's political imperative--denounced by abolitionists then and viewed critically by historians since--was to temporize on proclaiming emancipation. Lincoln's delaying tactics placated whites in crucial border states, especially Kentucky, even as blacks who escaped slavery voted for freedom with their feet. Skillfully weaving them into the military aspects of his lively narrative, Freehling uses statistics concerning Southern whites and blacks in Union blue to demonstrate the crucial enervation of Confederate military strength they indicate. A masterful account of the South's internal "house divided." Gilbert Taylor
Copyright © American Library Association. All rights reserved
Review
"A rattling good read, Freehling's re-rendering of the Civil War overflows with compelling commentary on race and emancipation, military strategy and battlefield blunders, slave resistance, anti-Confederate dissent and much, much more. The South vs. the South may cover familiar terrain, but Freehling recasts conflicts from Sumter to Appomattox to showcase his scintillating insights and bracing originality. This enthralling narrative deserves a wide audience."--Catherine Clinton, author of Fanny Kemble's Civil Wars"The South vs. the South quickens our understanding of the ways that African-Americans fought, labored, sacrificed, and died to help win the Civil War, and freedom. We learn also of Southern citizens loyal to the United States of America who courageously defied the secessionists and the Confederate government. Thanks to the author we are long steps closer to greater enlightenment."--Thomas B. Buell, author of The Warrior Generals: Combat Leadership in the Civil War"One of the most original and exciting books I've ever encountered. He takes a sweeping view of the Civil War, yet he explains carefully and precisely why, how, and where the Union triumphed and the Confederacy failed. At the heart of the struggle, and rightly so, he places the courage and actions of African Americans who directly aided and rescued the North in a multitude of ways, making a war for the Union a war for freedom. This book is a masterpiece of historical research, interpretation, and writing."--T. Michael Parrish, former president of the Society of Civil War Historians About the Author
William W. Freehling is Professor of History and Otis A. Singletary Chair in Humanities at the University of Kentucky, and is the author of The Road to Disunion, Volume I: Disunionists at Bay, 1776-1854, which won the Owsley Prize. He lives near Lexington, Kentucky.
![A Short History of Reconstruction [Updated Edition]](https://images-na.ssl-images-amazon.com/images/I/91DoJdwXLRL._AC_UL140_SR140,140_.jpg)
