Kindle Price: | $59.95 |
Sold by: | Amazon.com Services LLC |
Your Memberships & Subscriptions
Download the free Kindle app and start reading Kindle books instantly on your smartphone, tablet, or computer - no Kindle device required.
Read instantly on your browser with Kindle for Web.
Using your mobile phone camera - scan the code below and download the Kindle app.
OK
Beyond Significance Testing: Statistics Reform in the Behavioral Sciences, Second Edition Second Edition, Kindle Edition
- ISBN-13978-1433812781
- EditionSecond Edition
- PublisherAmerican Psychological Association
- Publication dateMarch 31, 2013
- LanguageEnglish
- File size22817 KB
Customers who bought this item also bought
Editorial Reviews
About the Author
Product details
- ASIN : B00OY844NI
- Publisher : American Psychological Association; Second Edition (March 31, 2013)
- Publication date : March 31, 2013
- Language : English
- File size : 22817 KB
- Text-to-Speech : Enabled
- Screen Reader : Supported
- Enhanced typesetting : Enabled
- X-Ray : Not Enabled
- Word Wise : Not Enabled
- Sticky notes : On Kindle Scribe
- Print length : 328 pages
- Best Sellers Rank: #3,274,110 in Kindle Store (See Top 100 in Kindle Store)
- #529 in Psychology Testing & Measurement
- #974 in Psychology Research
- #1,675 in Medical Psychology Testing & Measurement
- Customer Reviews:
About the author
Discover more of the author’s books, see similar authors, read author blogs and more
Customer reviews
Customer Reviews, including Product Star Ratings help customers to learn more about the product and decide whether it is the right product for them.
To calculate the overall star rating and percentage breakdown by star, we don’t use a simple average. Instead, our system considers things like how recent a review is and if the reviewer bought the item on Amazon. It also analyzed reviews to verify trustworthiness.
Learn more how customers reviews work on Amazon-
Top reviews
Top reviews from the United States
There was a problem filtering reviews right now. Please try again later.
significant scientific contributions. Why do you need to formulate a null hypothesis if you know statistical tricks to reject it?
This is the central point in an article I am now writing for a peer-reviewed journal, and Dr. Kline's book is a very helpful text in my goal
to show that the null hypothesis can, indeed, prevents scientific advances and particularly when null results are important but rejected
by the peer-review process that only agrees with papers rejecting the null hypothesis. If you conduct an experiment and your "experimental hypothesis" claims that the Method A will be a good method to teach English to immigrant children from Latin America Countries, your null hypothesis claims the opposite of your expected results (i.e., Method A is not a good method to teach English ). If your results do not support your experimental hypothesis, you would have trouble finding a peer-reviewed journal to publish your null results. However, your results are still very important for the school district in your community because they inform that this district does not need to spend lots of money producing a method for teaching English that does not actually work or is not effective in achieving the goal of this district, namely, teaching English to immigrant children from Latin American countries. In this example, the administration of that school district will be very happy to know that your results did not reject the null hypothesis!
The very idea that there are issues in statistics will be startling to many, and could be a powerful hook to draw in the potentially large audience of readers who use statistics in their profession. BST seems to be addressed to the author’s statistician colleagues rather than to researchers, clinicians, practitioners, policy-makers and students in many fields who could profit greatly from understanding the issues BST raises. This book, as it stands, is more likely to be a turn-off than a turn-on and that’s a shame.
Clearly, the field of statistics and its methods of analysis need to change. I hope for the next edition of this book the author will give some thought to how to increase the impact of his important and provocative ideas by presenting them in a way that can be more easily absorbed by those who can benefit most from his wisdom. In his own arresting formulation, "If psychologists are so smart, why are they so confused? Why is statistics carried out like compulsive handwashing?" (p. 95). Could it be that they, along with researchers in many other fields, need a supple, compelling, accessible, lucid, user-friendly account of statistics that can help them to think critically about, understand the meaning behind, and apply, statistical methods? It has been my experience and general impression (in over 45 years of doing biomedical research) that most statisticians are more interested in demonstrating their sagacity than in taking the time to teach effectively and well. This is as true of their writing as it is of their publications. Someone clearly needs to do better.