Amazon Prime Free Trial
FREE Delivery is available to Prime members. To join, select "Try Amazon Prime and start saving today with FREE Delivery" below the Add to Cart button and confirm your Prime free trial.
Amazon Prime members enjoy:- Cardmembers earn 5% Back at Amazon.com with a Prime Credit Card.
- Unlimited FREE Prime delivery
- Streaming of thousands of movies and TV shows with limited ads on Prime Video.
- A Kindle book to borrow for free each month - with no due dates
- Listen to over 2 million songs and hundreds of playlists
Important: Your credit card will NOT be charged when you start your free trial or if you cancel during the trial period. If you're happy with Amazon Prime, do nothing. At the end of the free trial, your membership will automatically upgrade to a monthly membership.
$31.95$31.95
Ships from: Amazon.com Sold by: Amazon.com
$22.57$22.57
Ships from: Amazon Sold by: Forsythia Books, LLC
Download the free Kindle app and start reading Kindle books instantly on your smartphone, tablet, or computer - no Kindle device required.
Read instantly on your browser with Kindle for Web.
Using your mobile phone camera - scan the code below and download the Kindle app.
Audible sample
Follow the authors
OK
Rules of the Game: Jutland and British Naval Command Paperback – Illustrated, February 21, 2013
Purchase options and add-ons
- Print length736 pages
- LanguageEnglish
- PublisherNaval Institute Press
- Publication dateFebruary 21, 2013
- Dimensions6 x 1.75 x 9 inches
- ISBN-101591143365
- ISBN-13978-1591143369
Book recommendations, author interviews, editors' picks, and more. Read it now
Frequently bought together
Customers who viewed this item also viewed
Editorial Reviews
Review
“This is history at its very best: properly raising the questions that we most want to have answered . . . . For all its learning – technical, historical, cultural – this book is always clear, vivid, and insightful. In short, great reading.” —StrategyPage
About the Author
Product details
- Publisher : Naval Institute Press; Reissue edition (February 21, 2013)
- Language : English
- Paperback : 736 pages
- ISBN-10 : 1591143365
- ISBN-13 : 978-1591143369
- Item Weight : 2.35 pounds
- Dimensions : 6 x 1.75 x 9 inches
- Best Sellers Rank: #1,123,719 in Books (See Top 100 in Books)
- #1,693 in World War I History (Books)
- #2,343 in Military Strategy History (Books)
- #2,513 in Naval Military History
- Customer Reviews:
About the authors
Discover more of the author’s books, see similar authors, read book recommendations and more.
Discover more of the author’s books, see similar authors, read book recommendations and more.
Customer reviews
Customer Reviews, including Product Star Ratings help customers to learn more about the product and decide whether it is the right product for them.
To calculate the overall star rating and percentage breakdown by star, we don’t use a simple average. Instead, our system considers things like how recent a review is and if the reviewer bought the item on Amazon. It also analyzed reviews to verify trustworthiness.
Learn more how customers reviews work on AmazonCustomers say
Customers find the book engaging and thought-provoking. They describe it as a fantastic, lucid read for history enthusiasts. The book provides a deeper understanding of the naval battle through its well-researched and footnoted history. Readers appreciate the colorful illustrations and technical details of warship design. The writing style is described as well-written and easy to read. The humor is also appreciated.
AI-generated from the text of customer reviews
Customers find the book fascinating and well-researched. They appreciate the detailed account of the naval battle of Jutland and its roots. The book provides a comprehensive analysis and background on the subject that is relevant and important for historians. Overall, it's considered an excellent and valuable work that is recommended for anyone interested in the topic.
"...and British Naval Command by Andrew Gordon is a brilliant, fascinating examination of the pivotal naval battle of World War I, the Battle of Jutland...." Read more
"...a huge amount of ground, Gordon's book is so well organized and thought out that it is easy to follow (unlike this review), and so well written that..." Read more
"Amazing account and analysis of the Royal Navy at Jutland, with an excellent study of the organizational culture of the RN Officer corps...." Read more
"...have been put fourth in the intervening (now) ninety-eight years is convincing and engaging as well as being by far the most lucid I have ever read...." Read more
Customers find the book easy to read and engaging. They say it's a must-read for historians and students of military history. The book is described as lucid and fun, and well worth reading for anyone interested in Jutland or the Royal Navy.
"...It is the finest book written on the subject of naval control and communications; one that is still required reading in many of the world’s naval..." Read more
"...is convincing and engaging as well as being by far the most lucid I have ever read...." Read more
"This is a fun read -- the author knows the RN and is not an academic...." Read more
"...He is a wonderful writer with many memorable phrases and insights into the personalities which are integral to the course of the battle from the..." Read more
Customers appreciate the book's history. They find it a good account of the Battle of Jutland, with stories and relationships that dry history leaves out. Readers also mention it's a unique study on military culture and its impact.
"...It is four books in one -- an interesting history, sociologically oriented, kind of Namierite, of the backgrounds and mindsets of the key decision-..." Read more
"...In any event I highly recommend this book to anyone who is a serious student of history...." Read more
"...Gordon does a superb job of telling the story of Jutland and of those men who took part but also gives a deeper understanding of not only what..." Read more
"...away from Rules of the Game with 2 things - first, an understanding of the Battle of Jutland - ship movements, etc...." Read more
Customers find the book's visual style effective. It analyzes trends and provides colorful, well-chosen anecdotes. The author takes us through even the technical details of warship design and capabilities. The illustrations depict individual pictures of men, ships, weapons, tactics, and overall shape of the book.
"...He analyzes the trends and illustrates them with colorful, well chosen anecdotes...." Read more
"...This book stands out however in that it takes a fresh look not only at the battle itself, but at the Royal Navy as a cultural institution...." Read more
"...has an engaging style that takes us through even the technical details of warship design and capabilities with remarkable flair...." Read more
"...Gordon does an outstanding job of painting individual pictures of the men, the ships, the weapons, the tactics, and the battle processes, then..." Read more
Customers find the writing quality good and easy to read. They appreciate the author's memorable phrases.
"...this review barely skims the surface of Gordon’s major—and eminently readable work...." Read more
"...to follow (unlike this review), and so well written that it is easy to read as well. I cannot recommend it strongly enough...." Read more
"...The writing is good, and sometimes wickedly amusing; the author's judgments on the major (and minor) figures seem sound and humane; and his views..." Read more
"...He is a wonderful writer with many memorable phrases and insights into the personalities which are integral to the course of the battle from the..." Read more
Customers enjoy the humor in the book. They find it amusing and engaging.
"...fourth in the intervening (now) ninety-eight years is convincing and engaging as well as being by far the most lucid I have ever read...." Read more
"...The writing is good, and sometimes wickedly amusing; the author's judgments on the major (and minor) figures seem sound and humane; and his views..." Read more
"...Well researched and cleverly written. Many of the aside comments are hilarious. A must have." Read more
Top reviews from the United States
There was a problem filtering reviews right now. Please try again later.
- Reviewed in the United States on February 21, 2016The Rules of the Game: Jutland and British Naval Command by Andrew Gordon is a brilliant, fascinating examination of the pivotal naval battle of World War I, the Battle of Jutland. It is the finest book written on the subject of naval control and communications; one that is still required reading in many of the world’s naval colleges (including Annapolis) among those men and women who someday will be captains and admirals of fleets.
Gordon does not suffer fools gladly. A working knowledge of Jutland and the Royal Navy is almost required to understand his monumental (622 pages, including notes) work. The reader would be better off first reading a general history of the encounter, such as Ronald H. Spector’s At War At Sea: Sailors and Naval Combat in the Twentieth Century.
Gordon details not only the technical aspects of Jutland, including battle maps, but also delves into the history of the Royal Navy and the problems with fleet communications at a time before use of the Marconi wireless became a factor. From the days of Nelson’s victory at Trafalgar, signal flags were a fundamental method of communicating orders from the fleet admiral in his flagship to all his units during maneuvers.
In a sense, the Royal Navy was too successful. From 1805 until 1914 the world enjoyed the Pax Britannica, a time when the British fleet secured relative calm on the oceans of the world. Good as this was, it also created a “peacetime mindset” among navies. For almost 200 years, advancement in the Royal Navy went to bureaucrats more than fighters; men whose advancement in the ranks depended upon pleasing their immediate superiors who demanded clean, neat ships, unquestioning performance in ship and fleet-handling and the condition of their “brightwork.” Creative thinking was discouraged in favor of slavish imitation and obedience—in short, the precise opposite of Lord Nelson’s approach to battle, where each ship’s captain was expected to engage the enemy and seize the unforeseen opportunities presented by close contact with an enemy fleet.
During the Pax, everything depended upon directions by the flagship. The bible of the Royal Navy was the Fleet Signal Book, a massive tome that detailed flag signals that covered every possible move by a ship. This sometimes required a flag hoist of dozens of flags—all which had to be read almost instantly by the signals officers on each ship in order to conform to fleet movements. Maybe the best example of this philosophy was Admiral Jellico, commander of the Royal Navy’s Grand Fleet during World War I.
The opposite of this philosophy of total central control is represented by Admiral Beatty, commander of the fast Battle Cruiser Fleet who gave a degree of individual initiative to his ship captains. In a land battle, the differences in these two philosophies would be between a set-piece army, such as at the Battle of Waterloo, and a free-ranging cavalry charging pell-mell at “targets of opportunity.”
During the Battle of Jutland, the problems with the set-piece philosophy where ship movements were controlled by the fleet admiral quickly became apparent. As soon as the Grand Fleet attacked Germany’s High Seas Fleet communication fell apart as Jellico’s flag signals were obscured by poor weather conditions (late in the day, rain squalls and fog), smoke from the coal burning battleships and cordite smoke from their guns. The result was fiasco: Captains who had been trained to a slavish obedience of flagship orders suddenly found themselves having to make individual decisions on ship-handling and attack. As a result, when the almost-certain chance came to destroy the High Seas Fleet, Germany’s Admiral Scheer managed to pull off a minor miracle by sneaking around the rear of the Royal Navy and making it back to the safety of German ports. What should have been another Trafalgar became a series of confused skirmishes between ships that accidently encountered each other during a literal fog of war.
Much of Gordon’s book minutely examines the contrast between these two philosophies of naval warfare; of the need in armed forces for obedience to superior officers while at the same time the importance of individual captains seizing unforeseen opportunities to destroy enemy ships and formations.
For the “armchair admiral,” this is the one essential book for his or her library. Because of space limitations this review barely skims the surface of Gordon’s major—and eminently readable work. As William Waldegrave is quoted, The Rules of the Game is, “For those who love the epic of sea power…unputdownable.”
- Reviewed in the United States on June 28, 2013Note the subtitle. If this book limited itself to the Battle of Jutland, it would easily rate 4 stars. It is more ambitious than that, and earns the extra star for delivering on that ambition.
It uses the Battle of Jutland as the chief exhibit and demonstration of the evolution of British naval command and what could probably best be characterized as the cult of Signals. After placing the 5th Battle Squadron isolated in harm's way, with the entire German fleet gunning for them, Gordon goes back and explains how they got into that situation. Starting with Trafalgar and proceeding through the intervening eleven decades, he tracks the increasing centralization of British naval command at sea. He analyzes the trends and illustrates them with colorful, well chosen anecdotes. Along the way he introduces a variety of characters and follows them through their efforts either to tie the ships in a given fleet together with their signals, or to cut the halyards and restore independent thinking to the repertoire of the naval commander.
Gordon gives a very good explanation of Admiral Tryon's campaign to impose a measure of initiative and drastically simplified operations on his subordinates. He explains what we understand of why it failed (some speculation is inevitable, under the circumstances), and the consequences.
The book details the rise of the three main characters of his account; Jellicoe, Beatty, and Hugh Evan-Thomas, following their careers and personal development as they ascended the ranks of naval command, each man in his own way.
In addition to giving a very good account of Jutland, and tracking the development of the Grand Fleet's command system, the book gives insights to the larger matter of the corporate culture of the Royal Navy over the long century following Trafalgar. He also follows Beatty's command of the Battle Cruiser Fleet at Heligoland Bight and Dogger Bank, and shows the thinking that played a major part in the loss of three British battlecruisers at Jutland.
Despite covering a huge amount of ground, Gordon's book is so well organized and thought out that it is easy to follow (unlike this review), and so well written that it is easy to read as well. I cannot recommend it strongly enough.
In my mind, this makes an excellent bookend with Roland Huntford's book, The Last Place on Earth, an account of the competition to reach the South Pole. Many men are found in both books, as well as the Royal Geographical Society and the Masons. Huntford's book is as much a study in leadership as it is of the polar expeditions.
If you find yourself wanting to know more of Tryon and the end of TA, then you may want to pick up Riichard Hough's Admirals in Collision.
- Reviewed in the United States on January 24, 2017Amazing account and analysis of the Royal Navy at Jutland, with an excellent study of the organizational culture of the RN Officer corps. I cannot disparage the quality of the research, but I felt the book was longer than necessary. Chapters on the pre war lives of the future kings, princes, and the royal consorts was interesting, and actually a bit relevant to the story, but certainly not worth the chapters in the middle of the book that distracted from the true theme of the book.
I wish this superb book was available in hardcover. I wasn't 200 pages in before the photo pages started falling out.
Top reviews from other countries
- Amazon CustomerReviewed in Canada on November 25, 2022
5.0 out of 5 stars Order received today
Order received today, perfect condition. Thanks
-
Martine de BReviewed in France on August 28, 2019
5.0 out of 5 stars Eblouissant sur le commandement anglais au Jutland
L'ouvrage est une analyse complète du commandement controversé anglais au Jutland comportant l'analyse la plus profonde (à notre connaissance) du "pourquoi" historique : l'époque victorienne antécédente, les carrières des officiers, les doctrines d'époque et méthodes de manœuvre des flottes... etc. L’ouvrage s'appuie pour ce faire sur une analyse évènementielle de la bataille elle même très détaillée et très convaincante, souvent novatrice. Le pavé se suffit à lui-même mais notre sentiment est que pour tirer le maximum de bénéfice des analyses (centrées sur le commandement et la manœuvre), mieux vaut avoir auparavant une culture du sujet. L'anglais utilisé est riche et le recours au dictionnaire a été plus important que d'ordinaire. L'ouvrage que tout intéressé par la guerre maritime 14-18 et le Jutland doit posséder !
- J. J. BradshawReviewed in the United Kingdom on September 5, 2017
5.0 out of 5 stars A stimulating book which challenges much established wisdom - essential reading for anybody seriously interested in Jutland
After all the words that have been written about the battle of Jutland it must be difficult to write a genuinely original book that brings fresh insights and analysis to the story, yet that is what Andrew Gordon achieved with this book. The book has established itself as one of those books which is name checked by just about every historian and which is considered to be required reading for anybody with a serious interest in the subject. And the book fully deserves its status as a modern classic, it combines serious and original analysis with trenchant commentary and written in a very engaging style.
The book is split into five parts, these being the background to the battle, the run to the south and turn North, a study of the Victorian and Edwardian RN which attempts to explain the cultural factors affecting RN command during the battle, the run to the North and clash of fleets followed by an analysis.
No study of Jutland can escape the Jellicoe - Beatty controversy and this is especially true of a book whose central theme is the conflict between Jellicoe's centralised command and the prescriptive nature of the grand fleet battle orders, and Beatty's loose mission focused command style which expected subordinates to anticipate their commanders intentions and act on initiative. Gordon falls very much on the side of Beatty in this conflict although it is to his credit that he does not avoid facing the ghastly behaviour of Beatty after the battle, particular his treatment of Ralph Seymour which was utterly appalling and of Hugh Evan - Thomas. Few could seriously dispute that Beatty was on the right side of this debate and what would become known as mission command was far superior to centralised control using a set of prescriptive battle orders. However, it is hard to escape the feeling that in making a point, Gordon goes too far and that some of his analysis strays into feeling somewhat tendentious and that a little more balance would actually have supported his case.
The book devotes significant effort to studying Beatty and the 5th battle squadron (5BS), and rightly so as perhaps no other part of the Jutland story goes to the heart of the Jellicoe vs. Beatty command debate as effectively as the story of 5BS. And this is the part of the story which probably challenges the advocates of Beatty more than any other. For all the forward thinking of Beatty, his failure to even meet with Evan - Thomas before sailing in order to brief him on what would be expected of him should the fleet sail was a shocking omission. The signals failures during the battle have been well documented and as Gordon freely admits the fact that Ralph Seymour was not the best flag lt shouldn't be used to try and excuse Beatty of his responsibilities, it was to his credit as a human being that he stood by Seymour during the war, displaying a loyalty his subordinate that was commendable in many ways (making his later turning on Seymour perhaps even more distasteful) but ultimately Beatty has to be assigned the responsibility for continuing to retain an officer of known deficiencies in such a critical role. That Evan - Thomas decided to take a very literal approach to signalling procedures was a great failing but it was for Beatty to have briefed him before the battle. One of the key qualities of a commander is to understand those they command and their capabilities. No matter how right Beatty was in principle, his ideas needed to be understood by those he commanded and implemented effectively and the mishandling of 5BS does not tell of a commander implementing effective command and control.
An odd omission given its relevance to the books central theme is that Gordon does not really consider the signalling error at the battle of Dogger Bank which led to the battle cruisers halting their pursuit of Hipper in order to destroy the already crippled large armoured cruiser Blucher (it should be noted that some have argued that as well as letting Hipper escape, this error could also have perhaps saved some of Beatty's ships from the fate that befell them at Jutland). This has generally been ascribed to Seymour's signalling, yet if Evan - Thomas is to be blamed for a lack of initiative in his literal approach to signalling protocol then surely the fact that the battle cruiser captains, captains who were apparently imbued with the spirit of Beatty and who had been well briefed were also guilty of what critics might call a mindless obedience to signals regardless of what military good sense might indicate is worthy of some comment? If his own battle cruisers had demonstrated such problems with displaying initiative at a critical moment, why on earth did Beatty assume that 5BS, coming from the grand fleet and accustomed to grand fleet battle orders, would fall in with his looser mission based style? I think this omission is quite a serious one as it is an important piece of the puzzle with significant implications for Gordon's analysis of the command approaches of Jellicoe and Beatty. To be simplistic, it is irrelevant how right an idea is if those who will have to execute it cannot do so.
The section on the Victorian and Edwardian navies attempts to explain the culture of obedience and emphasis on ship handling and complex manoeuvres of the pre-war navy and in particular the baleful effects of Admiral George Tryon's untimely demise when his flagship HMS Victoria was rammed by HMS Camperdown. In emphasising the importance of George Tryon's ideas and the adverse impact of these ideas being abandoned following Tryon's death I can only agree with Gordon. The book makes the point that Tryon's fleet was manoeuvring by signal when his terrible misjudgement resulted in tragedy making it rather ironic that the incident was used to discredit his TA system of manoeuvring without flags. This section feels a little odd in places, for example it dwells at some length on the role of freemasonry in the RN officer corps and polar exploration to help explain the lack of initiative shown by RN officers and their dependency on orders received from above. This section also feels a little over cooked, as while it is generally accepted that obedience to the signal book and an over emphasis on spit and polish and being able to execute impressive fleet manoeuvres which were of little value in action had far reaching consequences for the RN in WW1 it is unfair to pretend that RN officers of the era were in some way stupid or incompetent. I don't believe that this was Gordon's intent but it is the impression created by this section. Yet, it is heartening that Gordon does highlight that the famous quote of Berkely - Milne that he wasn't paid to think has been taken out of context.
Ultimately the book makes an error which Gordon himself identifies in other books on the subject, that of seeing the clash of culture between Jellicoe and Beatty as a zero sum game such that if Beatty's ideas were right then those of Jellicoe were wrong. No matter how important it is to foster initiative and seize opportunities, commanders also need to take care of the more mundane aspects of command and to understand the material they have been given. The poor gunnery of the battle cruisers in WW1, the failure to apply ammunition handling procedures and the failure to act on Seymour's signalling failures, all of which should have been identified and acted upon before the Jutland battle do not speak highly of Beatty. Equally, Jellicoe's rigid adherence to orthodoxy and his caution may have cost the RN the opportunity to destroy Scheer's fleet but it is also true that the superb gunnery of the grand fleet, its high morale and his appreciation of what his subordinates were capable of cannot be dismissed when considering Jellicoe's qualities. The truth is that a fleet commanders needs elements of both Jellicoe's technocratic attention to detail and Beatty's flair and willingness to exploit opportunities.
In a sense the endless Jellicoe - Beatty debate is rather sad, both men were courageous, dedicated officers who served their country well. Whatever failure can be ascribed to Beatty at Jutland it has to be recognised that he fulfilled his most important role superbly by delivering Scheer's fleet to the grand fleet. Equally, Jellicoe's deployment to cross Scheer's Tee was one of the singularly most vital command decisions of the war and a decision vindicated by all serious analysis whilst his caution was based on a pragmatic understanding of the relative strategic positions of the RN and German fleet.
The book finishes with 28 lessons for modern navies where Gordon demonstrates that the principal lessons identified by his analysis are applicable today, process vs. product, an over reliance on centralised command and the battle between rationalism and empiricism. I wouldn't disagree with Gordon's 28 points but at the same time it feels a bit anecdotal and homespun and oddly disappointing following the intellectual rigour displayed in the rest of the book.
If some of the above seems a bit negative, I'd emphasise again that this book is essential reading if you are interested in the battle of Jutland and it is a genuine classic of naval history. If some of my review seems a little negative it is because the book is so stimulating and forces the reader to reconsider their existing views. And in a sense that is the greatest achievement of the book, no matter how much you already know of the subject I am sure you will find something fresh and original in this book which will cause you to reconsider things. Cery highly recommended, 5*.
-
LeotrowskiReviewed in Germany on August 7, 2013
5.0 out of 5 stars The Rules of the Game
Der Author beschraenkt sich nicht nur auf die Seeschlacht im Skaggerak 1916 zwischen der Grandfleet und der Hochseeflotte, sondern beschreibt den Weg den die Royal Navy seit Anfang des 19.Jahrhunderts dorthin beschritten hat und zeigt die Schwierigkeiten der RN mit der Einfuehrung neuer Technologien.
Aus seiner Sicht ist das seit Trafalgar immer mehr zentralisierte Kommandosystem der RN mitverantwortlich fuer den aus britischer Sicht negativen Ausgang der Schlacht.
Das Buch beschreibt u.a. den Aufstieg und die Entwicklung dreier Hauptakteure auf britischer Seite, Jellicoe (Befehlshaber Grandfleet), Beatty (Befehlshaber Schlachtkreuzerflotte) und Evan-Thomas (Kommandeur 5.Battle Squadron).
Insgesamt eine hervorragende und sehr lesbare Darstellung der Skaggerak-Schlacht und des Weges dorthin und aus meiner Sicht zusammen mit Campbells "Jutland" und Massies "Dreadnought" und "Castles of Steel" unverzichtbar fuer alle, die sich mit der RN und dem Seekrieg 1914 - 1918 beschaeftigen.
- Photoshop_userReviewed in Germany on August 27, 2019
5.0 out of 5 stars Great book.
I‘m not a historian, so can‘t judge whether Gordon’s book is more accurate than the other books I read on Jutland/Skagerrak, but it surely is the best when it comes to the entertainment factor. Much More background infos given, than just the usual listing of ships, names, calibers and losses.