$23.49$23.49
FREE delivery Monday, May 20
Ships from: Canterbury Booksellers Sold by: Canterbury Booksellers
$9.59$9.59
Ships from: Amazon Sold by: Jenson Books Inc
Download the free Kindle app and start reading Kindle books instantly on your smartphone, tablet, or computer - no Kindle device required.
Read instantly on your browser with Kindle for Web.
Using your mobile phone camera - scan the code below and download the Kindle app.
OK
University: An Owner's Manual Hardcover – January 1, 1990
Purchase options and add-ons
- Print length309 pages
- LanguageEnglish
- PublisherW.W. Norton
- Publication dateJanuary 1, 1990
- Dimensions5 x 0.98 x 7.99 inches
- ISBN-100393027821
- ISBN-13978-0393027822
The Amazon Book Review
Book recommendations, author interviews, editors' picks, and more. Read it now.
Customers who bought this item also bought
Product details
- Publisher : W.W. Norton (January 1, 1990)
- Language : English
- Hardcover : 309 pages
- ISBN-10 : 0393027821
- ISBN-13 : 978-0393027822
- Item Weight : 1.17 pounds
- Dimensions : 5 x 0.98 x 7.99 inches
- Best Sellers Rank: #2,800,553 in Books (See Top 100 in Books)
- #5,391 in Education Administration (Books)
- #27,414 in Higher & Continuing Education
- Customer Reviews:
About the author
Discover more of the author’s books, see similar authors, read author blogs and more
Customer reviews
Customer Reviews, including Product Star Ratings help customers to learn more about the product and decide whether it is the right product for them.
To calculate the overall star rating and percentage breakdown by star, we don’t use a simple average. Instead, our system considers things like how recent a review is and if the reviewer bought the item on Amazon. It also analyzed reviews to verify trustworthiness.
Learn more how customers reviews work on Amazon-
Top reviews
Top reviews from the United States
There was a problem filtering reviews right now. Please try again later.
It is also a very limited book. It offers a sense of the `feel' of administration, the daily life of a dean, the nature of university relationships, principles and values. It is an account of university `culture'. It has almost nothing to say about the external forces that impinge on universities and the individuals (and share of the budget) devoted to dealing with them. It acknowledges the presence of university critics but opts for optimism rather than pessimism, even as it notes that some of the critics' claims are legitimate (grade inflation, trendy curricula, e.g.). Rosovsky's personal impulses are `old Harvard': moderate/liberal, northeastern and boosterish with a dab of sherry here and a love of crimson, silk robes there. The fact that he is an economist with an Asian area studies emphasis adds both rigor and breadth to some of his insights. The thrust of his comments is one of reassurance. "Here are the reasons for our procedures; they are rational and both tried and true."
The book should be of great interest to keepers of the Harvard flame. He describes the book as an `owner's manual'; it is actually a stakeholders' manual. Stakeholders are not the same as owners and the stakeholders here (Harvard students, Harvard faculty, Harvard alumni/ae, Cambridge residents and so on) will be interested in how the academic core of this particular University functions.
The problem for the rest of the reading public will be that Harvard is such an exception to the experience of nearly all other American institutions, including those whose stature approaches Harvard's. Its endowment, for example, offers it opportunities which few others enjoy; at the same time its dependency upon its endowment makes it subject to far greater threats when the market tanks. Its tenuring procedures are similar to a tiny handful of other institutions but markedly different from nearly everyone else's, including the 60+ members of the Association of American Universities--the top private/public research universities in America. Harvard does not tenure associate professors; nearly everyone else does. Harvard thus has a longer probationary period for junior staff, but then it requires candidates for tenure to compete with anyone and everyone outside of Harvard in the field in question. Harvard's every-tub-on-its-own-bottom budgeting is enormously expensive because it is duplicative. Its traditional `section man' teaching format, with large lectures presided over by tenured faculty with breakout sections managed by graduate students makes for larger class sizes than its cost and reputation would lead one to expect. Its size is relatively large and the number of professional students there creates an ethos that is not only vastly different from that of research colleges but also differently-proportioned than, e.g., top public institutions.
These are more descriptions of the book than criticisms of the book. I believe that nearly all of the author's values, instincts and principles are solid ones. He has actually written a superb book, but one whose title should have been something like "The Culture and Governance of the Arts and Sciences at Harvard University--A Stakeholder's Introduction."
This magnificent book distills the experience of his many years at Harvard into a guide that every prospective doctoral student and every faculty member at the top research universities should read. With kindness, wit, and unadulterated honesty and openness he explains how research universities work. Though the book is now 27 years old, it appears to be entirely accurate, with obvious exceptions like budgets, faculty pay, and the size of endowments. Running such a complex organization requires great intelligence and maturity, and both Rosovsky and the President of the university at that time, Derek Bok, were exemplary. He puts paid to so many of the easy and ignorant criticisms of America's greatest universities, which are also the greatest in the world, and the source of so much of the competitive advantage of the United States. He explains logically and almost humbly how intensely difficult it is to run such institutions, designed as they are to provide an environment in which great scholars can continue to learn and thrive, balancing research and teaching while struggling for tenure. Harvard, in preparing to hire a tenured professor, has always asked who is the best in the world. That seems fitting.